Our Specialists for Cervical Radiculopathy

Choosing the right operation for cervical radiculopathy depends on whether you have a soft disc herniation, bony foraminal stenosis, how many levels are involved, and whether you want motion preserved. Our spine team performs all three modern options — ACDF, cervical disc arthroplasty, and posterior cervical foraminotomy — and we match the procedure to your anatomy rather than the other way around.

Dr. Bydon
Mohamad Bydon, M.D.
Chair, Department of Neurological Surgery

Dr. Bydon is the Chair of Neurological Surgery at UChicago and a pioneer in minimally invasive and robotic spine surgery. He led the stem cell trial, the first-in-human stem cell therapy for spinal cord injury, and holds 12 medical device patents with over 600 peer-reviewed publications. He was recruited to UChicago from Mayo Clinic. Dr. Bydon's published long-term series of posterior cervical foraminotomy patients helped establish the procedure's durability, with an 85% rate of arm pain improvement and a very low adjacent-segment reoperation rate of 1.3% (J Neurosurg Spine, 2014). He has also led Quality Outcomes Database analyses comparing posterior foraminotomy head-to-head with ACDF for cervical radiculopathy (J Neurosurg Spine, 2024).

Dr. Herman
Martin Herman, M.D., Ph.D.
Program Director, Neurological Surgery Residency

Dr. Herman is Program Director of the Neurological Surgery Residency and a complex spine surgeon who practices the full spectrum of spine and neurorestoration procedures. He co-developed a fully implantable wireless intraspinal microstimulation device for restoring motor function after spinal cord injury, with publications in Artificial Organs and Scientific Reports. He has been named a Top Chicago Doctor for over a decade. Dr. Herman sees cervical radiculopathy patients weekly at UChicago and performs the full range of modern options — ACDF, cervical disc arthroplasty, and posterior foraminotomy — matching the procedure to each patient's specific pathology rather than defaulting to one approach.

Dr. Witham
Timothy F. Witham, M.D., FACS
Section Chief, Spine Surgery

Dr. Witham is Section Chief of Spine Surgery at UChicago and a pioneer in augmented reality-guided spine surgery. In 2020 he performed the first FDA-cleared AR-guided spine surgery on a living patient using the xvision system, and he has published extensively on AR-assisted pedicle screw placement. He came to UChicago from Johns Hopkins, where he was Professor of Neurological Surgery and Orthopaedic Surgery and served as co-program director of the neurosurgery residency. Dr. Witham co-authored the long-term outcomes study of posterior cervical foraminotomy that remains one of the most cited series on the procedure (J Neurosurg Spine, 2014), and has spent his career refining minimally invasive and navigation-guided approaches to the cervical spine.

What Is Cervical Radiculopathy?

Cervical radiculopathy is what happens when one of the nerve roots exiting your spinal cord in the neck gets compressed or irritated. Each of those nerve roots carries signals to a specific zone of your shoulder, arm, and hand — so when one is pinched, you don't just feel neck pain. You feel pain, numbness, tingling, or weakness traveling down the arm, often in a specific pattern that tells us which nerve is involved.

It's more common than people realize. A classic population study from Rochester, Minnesota found an annual incidence of about 83 cases per 100,000 people, with the peak age between 50 and 54. The C7 nerve root (from the C6-7 disc) is by far the most commonly affected, followed by C6 and C8.

The two main ways a nerve root gets pinched in the neck are very different, and they point toward different treatments:

At a Glance

  • Cervical radiculopathy is a pinched nerve root in the neck — the pain, numbness, or weakness travels down the arm, not just the neck
  • About 75-90% of people improve within weeks to months with non-surgical care alone
  • The most common cause in younger patients is a soft disc herniation; in older patients it's bony foraminal narrowing from arthritis
  • When surgery is needed, the three modern options are ACDF, cervical disc replacement, and posterior cervical foraminotomy
  • Arm pain relief rates after surgery are excellent — around 85-95% of patients get meaningful improvement
Talk to Our Team

Have imaging or a diagnosis already?

We'll have a specialist review your MRI and records — often within 24 hours.

Call (773) 702-2123

What Does It Feel Like?

The hallmark is arm pain that's worse than the neck pain. Many patients describe it as electric, burning, or like a deep ache — and it usually follows a specific path depending on which nerve is compressed.

Typical patterns by nerve root

Other common features

If you develop trouble walking, loss of hand dexterity on both sides, or new bowel or bladder changes, that's a sign the spinal cord itself may be involved (myelopathy), not just a nerve root — and that needs urgent evaluation.

How Is It Diagnosed?

Most of the diagnosis comes from the story you tell and a careful physical exam. Your doctor will test strength, sensation, and reflexes in both arms and may perform provocative maneuvers like Spurling's test — tilting and compressing the head — to try to reproduce your arm pain.

Imaging

An MRI of the cervical spine is the gold standard. It shows the discs, nerve roots, and spinal cord in detail, and will typically reveal the soft disc herniation or bony stenosis causing your symptoms. A cervical X-ray is often done first or alongside MRI to assess overall alignment, instability, and the degree of arthritis.

Here's an important caveat: MRI findings in the neck are extremely common even in people without symptoms. Your surgeon's job is to confirm that what's on the scan actually matches what's happening in your arm.

Electrodiagnostic testing

An EMG/nerve conduction study is sometimes used when the diagnosis isn't clear — for example, when the MRI shows multiple possible culprits, when symptoms don't fit a clean pattern, or to rule out other conditions like carpal tunnel syndrome, ulnar neuropathy, or brachial plexopathy.

Types of Cervical Radiculopathy

Not all pinched nerves in the neck are the same, and the underlying type shapes which surgery makes sense.

Soft disc herniation

A tear in the outer ring of the disc allows the softer inner material to push out and press on the nerve. These tend to happen more suddenly, often in people in their 30s and 40s, sometimes after lifting or an awkward movement. The body can actually resorb a herniated disc fragment over weeks to months, which is why conservative treatment works so well for many of these cases. When surgery is needed for a one-sided soft disc herniation, a posterior cervical foraminotomy can often remove the offending fragment without fusing the spine at all.

Spondylotic foraminal stenosis

With age, the discs dry out and lose height, the facet joints grow bone spurs, and the ligaments thicken. The small tunnel (foramen) where the nerve root exits gradually narrows. This is the more common cause in patients over 50, and because the problem is bony, the nerve doesn't decompress itself the way a soft herniation might. Conservative care still helps many people, but when surgery is needed, ACDF is often preferred because it restores disc height and indirectly opens the foramen.

Central versus foraminal pathology

Some patients have a disc or bone spur pressing toward the center of the canal (near the spinal cord), some have it pressing into the foramen (near the exiting nerve root), and some have both. Pure foraminal pathology on one side is the classic case for a posterior foraminotomy. Central or bilateral pathology, kyphotic alignment, or involvement of multiple levels usually point toward an anterior operation.

How Is It Treated?

Conservative care comes first — and usually works

Unless you have significant or progressive weakness, the first step is non-surgical treatment. Most people with cervical radiculopathy get better without an operation: roughly 75-90% improve within a few weeks to a few months with conservative management. A typical program includes:

We generally recommend 6 weeks of conservative care before talking about surgery, unless symptoms are severe or there's progressive weakness, signs of myelopathy, or unrelenting pain.

When surgery makes sense

The main reasons to consider surgery are: (1) severe arm pain that hasn't responded to several weeks of non-operative care, (2) progressive motor weakness, or (3) signs that the spinal cord itself is involved. There are three modern surgical options, and choosing between them is where experience matters.

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)

This is the most common operation for cervical radiculopathy and has been the workhorse of spine surgery for decades. Through a small incision at the front of the neck, the surgeon removes the entire damaged disc, decompresses the nerve and spinal cord, and places a spacer (with a small plate or screws) to restore disc height and fuse that level. Arm pain relief is excellent — around 90% of patients in published series. Recovery is fast: many people go home the same day and return to desk work within a week or two. The tradeoff is that the fused level no longer moves, which places slightly more stress on the neighboring discs.

Cervical disc arthroplasty (disc replacement)

Instead of fusing the level, the damaged disc is replaced with an artificial disc that preserves motion. FDA investigational device exemption (IDE) trials comparing arthroplasty to ACDF have now followed patients out to 10 and even 20 years, and the results are consistent: arthroplasty is at least as good as ACDF for arm pain relief, and has lower rates of adjacent-segment disease and repeat surgery. The best candidates are younger patients with a soft disc herniation, good alignment, no instability, and minimal facet arthritis — the artificial disc needs a healthy joint environment to work.

Posterior cervical foraminotomy

For the right patient — typically one-sided arm pain from a lateral soft disc herniation or foraminal bone spur — a small incision is made at the back of the neck, and the surgeon removes a tiny piece of bone to uncover and decompress the nerve. No fusion, no plate, no hardware. The disc is preserved and motion is preserved. It can be done through a tubular minimally invasive approach. The FACET randomized trial out of the Netherlands showed that posterior foraminotomy was non-inferior to ACDF for arm pain relief and clinical success at 1 and 2 years. The tradeoff is that it's less suitable for central disc herniations, bilateral symptoms, or kyphotic alignment — and it's more technically demanding than it looks.

Which procedure is preferred when?

Second Opinion

Considering surgery or planning a second opinion?

Our multidisciplinary team reviews complex cases together. You'll get a coordinated plan, not one opinion.

Call (773) 702-2123

What Are the Outcomes?

The good news about cervical radiculopathy is that results of treatment — whether conservative or surgical — are generally very good. Here's how the data breaks down:

TreatmentArm Pain ReliefReoperation / Adjacent SegmentWhat to know
Conservative care75-90% improve~26% eventually have surgeryFirst-line for most; takes weeks to months
ACDF~90%~2.9% per year adjacent segment disease; ~26% by 10 yearsMost versatile; fuses the level
Cervical arthroplasty~90%+Significantly lower than ACDF at 10 yearsPreserves motion; requires right anatomy
Posterior foraminotomy~85-90%~1-2% adjacent segment; ~5-7% same-level reoperationNo fusion; best for one-sided foraminal pathology

The adjacent segment question

One concern with ACDF is adjacent segment disease — the idea that fusing one level puts extra stress on the discs above and below. The classic Hilibrand study found symptomatic adjacent segment disease developing at about 2.9% per year, with roughly 26% of patients affected by 10 years. That's a real number, but it's also important context: some of that likely reflects the natural progression of cervical spondylosis, not just the fusion itself. The FDA IDE trials comparing arthroplasty to ACDF suggest arthroplasty does reduce the risk of adjacent segment problems and reoperation at 10 years.

The bottom line

For most people with cervical radiculopathy, the outlook is genuinely good. Whether you heal with conservative care or need an operation, you should expect meaningful relief of your arm pain and return to your normal life. The decisions that matter most are which treatment fits your specific anatomy and goals, and who performs it if you need surgery.

References

Carette S, Fehlings MG. Clinical practice. Cervical radiculopathy. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005;353(4):392-399. PMID: 16049211
Radhakrishnan K, Litchy WJ, O'Fallon WM, Kurland LT. Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990. Brain. 1994;117(Pt 2):325-335. PMID: 8186959
Bono CM, Ghiselli G, Gilbert TJ, et al. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of cervical radiculopathy from degenerative disorders. The Spine Journal. 2011;11(1):64-72. PMID: 21168100
Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 1999;81(4):519-528. PMID: 10225797
Gornet MF, Burkus JK, Shaffrey ME, Schranck FW, Copay AG. Cervical disc arthroplasty: 10-year outcomes of the Prestige LP cervical disc at a single level. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2019;31(3):317-325. PMID: 31075769
Lavelle WF, Riew KD, Levi AD, Florman JE. Ten-year outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the BRYAN cervical disc: results from a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Spine. 2019;44(9):601-608. PMID: 30363047
Parish JM, Coric D. Cervical arthroplasty: long-term outcomes of FDA IDE trials. Global Spine Journal. 2020;10(2 Suppl):61S-64S. PMID: 32528808
Broekema AEH, Kuijlen JMA, Lesman-Leegte GAT, et al. Noninferiority of posterior cervical foraminotomy vs anterior cervical discectomy with fusion for procedural success and reduction in arm pain among patients with cervical radiculopathy at 1 year: the FACET randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurology. 2023;80(1):40-48. PMID: 36409485
Bydon M, Mathios D, Macki M, de la Garza-Ramos R, Sciubba DM, Witham TF, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A. Long-term patient outcomes after posterior cervical foraminotomy: an analysis of 151 cases. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2014;21(5):727-731. PMID: 25127430
Mummaneni PV, Bisson EF, Asher AL, et al. Comparing posterior cervical foraminotomy with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in radiculopathic patients: an analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2024;41(1):56-65. PMID: 38626479
Liu WJ, Hu L, Chou PH, Liu MW, Kan WS. Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review. Orthopaedic Surgery. 2016;8(4):425-431. PMID: 28032703
Engquist M, Lofgren H, Oberg B, et al. Surgery versus nonsurgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy: a prospective, randomized study comparing surgery plus physiotherapy with physiotherapy alone with a 2-year follow-up. Spine. 2013;38(20):1715-1722. PMID: 23778373

Have Questions About Cervical Radiculopathy?

Our team is here to review your case, discuss your options, and help you take the next step.

Schedule: (773) 702-2123