Our Specialists for Olfactory Groove Meningioma

Olfactory groove meningiomas grow slowly in one of the most forgiving-looking parts of the brain — until they don't. By the time most patients notice something is wrong, the tumor is often already large and pressing on the optic nerves, the frontal lobes, and the major arteries that feed them. Getting all of it out, through the right corridor, is the difference between a cure and a complication.

Dr. Horowitz
Peleg Horowitz, M.D., Ph.D.
Co-Director, Pituitary & Neuroendocrine Disorders Program

Dr. Horowitz is a skull base and neuro-oncology surgeon who also serves as Director of Quality and Associate Program Director for the Neurological Surgery residency. His laboratory research has identified novel genes driving meningioma and pediatric glioma formation, with work published in Nature Genetics and PNAS, and is funded by the DoD Neurofibromatosis Research Program. He holds a PhD in neuroscience from Northwestern and completed residency at Brigham and Women's/Boston Children's with a skull base fellowship at MD Anderson. Dr. Horowitz co-directs UChicago's anterior skull base program and routinely tailors the corridor for olfactory groove meningiomas — bifrontal, unilateral subfrontal, supraorbital keyhole, or endoscopic endonasal — to the specific anatomy of each tumor. His laboratory has also published on the molecular drivers of meningioma formation, which increasingly informs how we decide on adjuvant treatment after resection.

Dr. Ali
Rohaid Ali, M.D.
Director, Endoscopic Neurosurgery

Dr. Ali is Director of Endoscopic Neurosurgery at UChicago, specializing in minimally invasive keyhole approaches to skull base and intracranial lesions. His practice focuses on endoscopic techniques for pituitary and skull base tumors, using narrow corridors through the nose or small cranial openings to reach deep lesions with minimal disruption of surrounding tissue. As Director of Endoscopic Neurosurgery at UChicago, Dr. Ali leads the endoscopic endonasal program — the minimally invasive corridor through the nose that is often the right answer for smaller, midline olfactory groove meningiomas that have already eroded into the cribriform plate. He works in a combined two-surgeon, four-handed technique with our otolaryngology skull base partners for these cases.

Dr. Yamini
Bakhtiar Yamini, M.D.
Vice Chair for Academic Affairs; Director, Neurosurgical Oncology

Dr. Yamini is a brain tumor surgeon and scientist who serves as Vice Chair for Academic Affairs and Director of Neurosurgical Oncology at UChicago. In the operating room, he uses advanced imaging and navigation tools for stereotactic biopsy, laser ablation, and image-guided maximal resection. In his lab, he runs NIH-funded research into why some tumors resist treatment and into biodegradable nanoparticle vectors that deliver drugs directly to CNS tumors. Dr. Yamini directs neurosurgical oncology at UChicago and sees anterior skull base meningioma patients in combined clinic with radiation oncology and neuro-oncology, so the plan for an olfactory groove meningioma — observation, surgery, radiosurgery, or a combination — is made by the whole team on the same day. His laboratory also investigates the molecular biology of brain tumors, including drivers of meningioma recurrence.

What Is an Olfactory Groove Meningioma?

An olfactory groove meningioma is a tumor that grows from the meninges — the thin protective lining of the brain — right over the cribriform plate and planum sphenoidale, the bony floor of the front of the skull. That floor is the roof of your nasal cavity and sits directly under the undersurface of the frontal lobes. These tumors tend to push the frontal lobes up and backward as they grow, and eventually they reach down toward the optic nerves and the arteries supplying the front of the brain.

About 10% of all intracranial meningiomas arise in this location, which makes olfactory groove meningiomas one of the more common anterior skull base tumors. Like most meningiomas, they are usually benign (WHO grade 1 in roughly 90% of cases), they grow slowly over years, and they do not invade the brain itself. What makes them tricky is not the tumor biology — it's the real estate. A few millimeters separate the tumor from the optic nerves, the olfactory nerves, and the anterior cerebral arteries that feed both frontal lobes.

Because the frontal lobes can accommodate a tumor for a surprisingly long time, many olfactory groove meningiomas are already large at the time of diagnosis — it is not unusual for them to be 4, 5, or even 6 centimeters across when first discovered. The size and the lateral reach of the tumor are the biggest factors that decide which surgical approach is right for you.

At a Glance

  • Olfactory groove meningiomas are benign tumors (WHO grade 1 in about 90% of cases) that grow from the dura overlying the cribriform plate and planum sphenoidale at the front of the skull base
  • Because they grow silently under the frontal lobes, many are already 4-6 cm at diagnosis — with classic symptoms of loss of smell, personality change, and visual decline
  • Complete removal is curative for most patients, with 10-year recurrence-free survival above 85% after a Simpson grade 1 resection
  • We tailor the approach — bifrontal, unilateral subfrontal/frontolateral, supraorbital keyhole, or endoscopic endonasal — to the size, lateral reach, and vascular anatomy of each tumor
  • Protecting vision and the arteries feeding the frontal lobes is the single biggest factor in a good outcome — and it depends on the experience of the surgical team
Talk to Our Team

Have imaging or a diagnosis already?

We'll have a specialist review your MRI and records — often within 24 hours.

Call (773) 702-2123

What Does It Feel Like?

Olfactory groove meningiomas are famous for presenting late. The frontal lobes — especially the undersurface — tolerate slow compression unusually well, and the early symptoms are subtle enough that they're often attributed to aging, stress, or depression. When symptoms do appear, they usually come in three patterns.

Loss of smell (anosmia)

Frontal lobe syndrome

Visual symptoms

Any combination of unexplained loss of smell, a personality change, and a vision problem deserves an MRI. Catching an olfactory groove meningioma before the optic nerves and frontal lobes are permanently injured is far easier than trying to reverse the damage afterward.

How Is It Diagnosed?

The diagnosis almost always starts with MRI of the brain with and without contrast. Olfactory groove meningiomas have a very recognizable appearance: a rounded or lobulated mass sitting on the floor of the front of the skull, enhancing brightly with contrast, and typically showing a dural tail along the cribriform plate and planum sphenoidale. MRI also tells us exactly where the optic nerves, anterior cerebral arteries, and optic chiasm are in relation to the tumor — the details that determine which surgical corridor is safest.

A CT scan is almost always added, because CT shows bone in a way MRI cannot. It tells us whether the tumor has caused hyperostosis (thickening) or erosion of the cribriform plate, whether there is extension down into the ethmoid sinuses or nasal cavity, and whether the frontal sinus is in the surgical path. CT angiography or MR angiography maps the anterior cerebral arteries (the A2 segments), which are often draped over the top of these tumors and must be preserved.

A formal ophthalmology evaluation with visual acuity, visual fields, and optic nerve assessment is essential before surgery. Subtle field defects are often the first objective sign of optic nerve compression, and establishing a baseline matters for tracking recovery after surgery. Formal olfactory testing is sometimes added when preserving smell is a realistic goal.

The definitive diagnosis — the pathologic confirmation that a tumor is a meningioma and its WHO grade — is made after surgery, when the tissue is examined under the microscope. Today, molecular testing is increasingly part of that workup: specific genetic changes can upgrade a meningioma's grade and change recommendations about adjuvant radiation.

Types of Olfactory Groove Meningioma

Olfactory groove meningiomas are grouped less by their microscopic subtype (they are almost all benign WHO grade 1) and more by their size and their relationship to nearby structures. That anatomy is what actually drives the surgical plan.

By size

By relationship to the superior sagittal sinus and A2 arteries

By relationship to the optic chiasm

By extension into the nasal cavity or sinuses

How Is It Treated?

Should this tumor come out at all?

For a small, asymptomatic olfactory groove meningioma found incidentally — especially in an older patient with other medical problems — the right answer is sometimes to watch it with serial MRIs at 6 months, then yearly. For any tumor that is symptomatic, growing on imaging, or pressing on the optic apparatus, surgery is the treatment of choice, because complete removal is usually curative.

The surgical corridor — choosing the right approach

There is no single best operation for olfactory groove meningioma. The corridor is chosen based on tumor size, its lateral reach, how far it extends down into the nose, its relationship to the A2 arteries and optic nerves, and the patient's goals around smell and vision preservation.

Bifrontal craniotomy

A traditional bifrontal approach — opening the bone across both sides of the forehead — gives the widest possible view of the anterior skull base and is particularly useful for large and giant tumors or tumors with significant bony involvement of the cribriform plate on both sides. It allows complete removal of the dural attachment and involved bone in a single piece (a Simpson grade 1 resection). The trade-off is a larger exposure and, in older series, a somewhat higher rate of minor complications than unilateral approaches.

Unilateral subfrontal or frontolateral craniotomy

For most tumors, we can remove the entire lesion through a unilateral craniotomy — either a subfrontal approach from directly above the eyebrow or a frontolateral approach from just behind it. A pooled analysis of more than 1,000 patients showed that unilateral corridors have lower overall complication rates than bifrontal approaches while still achieving equivalent rates of complete resection, even for sizeable tumors. The unilateral approach also tends to do better at preserving the olfactory nerve on the uninvolved side.

Supraorbital "keyhole" craniotomy

For smaller and medium-sized tumors that don't extend far laterally, a supraorbital keyhole — a small, roughly 3 cm craniotomy hidden in the eyebrow — offers a minimally invasive corridor to the anterior skull base. Meta-analyses report gross total resection rates around 85% for olfactory groove meningiomas removed this way, with minimal frontal lobe retraction and excellent cosmetic results. It is not the right approach for a 6 cm giant — but for the right tumor and the right patient, it is a powerful option.

Endoscopic endonasal approach

For carefully selected tumors — particularly those that are smaller, that sit in the midline without wide lateral extension, and that have already eroded through the cribriform plate into the nose — a purely endoscopic endonasal approach can remove the tumor from below, through the nostrils, without any skin incision or brain retraction. The trade-offs are real: the endonasal approach sacrifices olfaction on the involved side, has a higher rate of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak than transcranial approaches, and is not the right choice for tumors that extend laterally beyond the optic nerves or that encase the A2 arteries. When offered to the right patient, though, it can shorten recovery and improve visual outcomes.

Protecting vision and the arteries

Whichever corridor we choose, the same principles apply: early internal decompression of the tumor (taking the bulk out from the inside) so the capsule can be collapsed away from the optic nerves, sharp microsurgical dissection to separate the tumor from the A2 arteries without kinking or coagulating them, and meticulous skull base reconstruction with a vascularized flap to keep CSF where it belongs. Intraoperative navigation, high-field microscopes, and (for endonasal cases) endoscopic visualization are standard parts of our anterior skull base setup.

Radiation therapy — when, and when not

For WHO grade 1 tumors that are completely removed, radiation is not needed. For residual tumor that could not be safely removed, for grade 2 (atypical) tumors, or for recurrences, stereotactic radiosurgery (a single focused dose, usually Gamma Knife) or fractionated radiation are excellent adjuncts. Long-term control rates for radiosurgery applied to residual benign meningiomas approach 90%.

Second Opinion

Considering surgery or planning a second opinion?

Our multidisciplinary team reviews complex cases together. You'll get a coordinated plan, not one opinion.

Call (773) 702-2123

What Are the Outcomes?

For olfactory groove meningiomas, outcomes are driven by three things: how much of the tumor is removed (the Simpson grade), whether the optic nerves are decompressed in time, and whether the A2 arteries and their small branches stay intact. When complete removal is achieved, most patients are essentially cured, and the large majority of preoperative visual and cognitive deficits improve.

OutcomeTypical resultWhat to know
Gross total resection (transcranial)~90-95%Simpson grade 1 or 2 is achievable in most cases
Gross total resection (endoscopic endonasal)~70-85%Best for smaller, midline tumors without lateral reach
Visual improvement when vision was affected~60-80%Higher after endonasal decompression in selected cases
Preservation of olfaction (transcranial, unilateral)~30-50%Best when preoperative smell is preserved on the uninvolved side
Preservation of olfaction (bifrontal or endonasal)very lowThese approaches almost always sacrifice the olfactory nerves
5-year recurrence-free survival (complete resection)>90%Very good when Simpson 1 is achieved
10-year recurrence (modern series)~5-15%Late recurrences reported; long-term MRI follow-up is essential

A few things are worth emphasizing. First, the biggest predictor of long-term control is whether the tumor and its dural attachment are completely removed the first time — which in turn depends on the surgical corridor and the surgeon's comfort operating around the optic apparatus and A2 arteries. Second, the frontal lobe changes that many patients describe — apathy, slowed thinking, loss of initiative — usually improve significantly after the tumor is decompressed, though the timeline can stretch over many months. Third, even with a Simpson grade 1 resection, late recurrences do happen; regular MRI follow-up for at least 10 years is part of the plan.

The single most important thing you can control is the experience of the team doing your operation. Olfactory groove meningiomas are uncommon enough that a center's cumulative volume makes a real difference — in choosing the right corridor, in protecting your vision, and in getting you to a cure on the first attempt.

References

Nakamura M, Struck M, Roser F, et al. Olfactory groove meningiomas: clinical outcome and recurrence rates after tumor removal through the frontolateral and bifrontal approach. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(6 Suppl 3):1224-1232. PMID: 18695543
Spektor S, Valarezo J, Fliss DM, et al. Olfactory groove meningiomas from neurosurgical and ear, nose, and throat perspectives: approaches, techniques, and outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(4 Suppl):268-280. PMID: 16234674
Bassiouni H, Asgari S, Stolke D. Olfactory groove meningiomas: functional outcome in a series treated microsurgically. Acta Neurochirurgica (Wien). 2007;149(2):109-121. PMID: 17180303
Koutourousiou M, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Wang EW, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA. Endoscopic endonasal surgery for olfactory groove meningiomas: outcomes and limitations in 50 patients. Neurosurgical Focus. 2014;37(4):E8. PMID: 25391163
Shetty SR, Ruiz-Trevino AS, Omay SB, et al. Limitations of the endonasal endoscopic approach in treating olfactory groove meningiomas. A systematic review. Acta Neurochirurgica (Wien). 2017;159(10):1875-1885. PMID: 28831590
Roa Montes de Oca JC, Goncalves Estella JM, Nieto-Librero AB, et al. Olfactory groove meningiomas: comprehensive assessment between the different microsurgical transcranial approaches and the endoscopic endonasal approaches, systematic review and meta-analysis on behalf of the EANS skull base section. Brain and Spine. 2022;2:101661. PMID: 36605386
Bamimore MA, Marenco-Hillembrand L, Ravindran K, et al. Smell outcomes in olfactory groove meningioma resection through unilateral versus bilateral transcranial approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurgery. 2022;160:22-32. PMID: 35033688
Khan DZ, Muskens IS, Mekary RA, et al. The endoscope-assisted supraorbital 'keyhole' approach for anterior skull base meningiomas: an updated meta-analysis. Acta Neurochirurgica (Wien). 2021;163(3):661-676. PMID: 32889640
Snyder WE, Shah MV, Weisberger EC, Campbell RL. Presentation and patterns of late recurrence of olfactory groove meningiomas. Skull Base Surgery. 2000;10(3):131-139. PMID: 17171137
Goldbrunner R, Stavrinou P, Jenkinson MD, et al. EANO guideline on the diagnosis and management of meningiomas. Neuro-Oncology. 2021;23(11):1821-1834. PMID: 34181733
Nanda A, Bir SC, Maiti TK, et al. Relevance of Simpson grading system and recurrence-free survival after surgery for World Health Organization Grade I meningioma. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2017;126(1):201-211. PMID: 27058201
Ostrom QT, Price M, Neff C, et al. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2016-2020. Neuro-Oncology. 2023;25(Suppl 4):iv1-iv99. PMID: 37793125

Have Questions About Olfactory Groove Meningioma?

Our team is here to review your case, discuss your options, and help you take the next step.

Schedule: (773) 702-2123