Our Specialists for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

Degenerative spondylolisthesis is one of the most studied conditions in spine surgery, and the decision of whether to decompress alone or to add a fusion is still one of the most debated. The surgeons who treat this condition well are the ones who know the literature, tailor the operation to the individual patient, and have done enough of these cases to make the right call.

Dr. Bydon
Mohamad Bydon, M.D.
Chair, Department of Neurological Surgery

Dr. Bydon is the Chair of Neurological Surgery at UChicago and a pioneer in minimally invasive and robotic spine surgery. He led the stem cell trial, the first-in-human stem cell therapy for spinal cord injury, and holds 12 medical device patents with over 600 peer-reviewed publications. He was recruited to UChicago from Mayo Clinic. Dr. Bydon launched one of the nation's first dedicated robotic and minimally invasive spine programs in 2015, has published extensively on fusion outcomes for Grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis using the Quality Outcomes Database, and co-authored landmark comparisons of minimally invasive versus open TLIF for this exact condition (Neurosurgical Focus, 2017).

Dr. Witham
Timothy F. Witham, M.D., FACS
Section Chief, Spine Surgery

Dr. Witham is Section Chief of Spine Surgery at UChicago and a pioneer in augmented reality-guided spine surgery. In 2020 he performed the first FDA-cleared AR-guided spine surgery on a living patient using the xvision system, and he has published extensively on AR-assisted pedicle screw placement. He came to UChicago from Johns Hopkins, where he was Professor of Neurological Surgery and Orthopaedic Surgery and served as co-program director of the neurosurgery residency. Dr. Witham performed the first FDA-cleared augmented reality-guided spine surgery on a living patient and has published on AR-assisted pedicle screw placement accuracy approaching 98% (J Neurosurg Spine, 2021) — directly relevant to the screw placement precision that makes modern MIS fusion safe.

Dr. Herman
Martin Herman, M.D., Ph.D.
Program Director, Neurological Surgery Residency

Dr. Herman is Program Director of the Neurological Surgery Residency and a complex spine surgeon who practices the full spectrum of spine and neurorestoration procedures. He co-developed a fully implantable wireless intraspinal microstimulation device for restoring motor function after spinal cord injury, with publications in Artificial Organs and Scientific Reports. He has been named a Top Chicago Doctor for over a decade. Dr. Herman is one of the complex spine surgeons who evaluates degenerative spondylolisthesis patients weekly at UChicago and performs the full range of decompression-only and fusion procedures, including minimally invasive approaches.

What Is Degenerative Spondylolisthesis?

Your spine is made of a stack of bones called vertebrae, held in careful alignment by discs, ligaments, and small joints on the back of each bone called facet joints. As you age, the discs dry out and the facet joints wear down — and sometimes, the joint wears out so much that one vertebra starts to slide forward on the one below it. That slip is called a spondylolisthesis.

The most common level for this to happen is L4 on L5, right at the base of the lower back. Women after menopause are affected about four times more often than men, and the condition becomes increasingly common after age 50.

When a vertebra slips forward, it drags the spinal canal and the nerve roots with it, pinching them. That pinching — called spinal stenosis — is what causes most of the symptoms. So when we talk about treating spondylolisthesis, we're really treating two problems at once: the nerve compression, and the instability from the slip itself.

At a Glance

  • Spondylolisthesis means one vertebra has slipped forward on the one below it, most commonly at L4-L5
  • It causes a mix of lower back pain, leg pain, and the classic inability to stand or walk for long without sitting down
  • Many patients get significant relief from physical therapy, weight loss, and targeted injections
  • When surgery is needed, options range from simple decompression to minimally invasive fusion with robotically placed screws
  • Large randomized trials disagree about whether fusion is necessary — which is why the right surgeon and the right judgment matter
Talk to Our Team

Have imaging or a diagnosis already?

We'll have a specialist review your MRI and records — often within 24 hours.

Call (773) 702-2123

What Does It Feel Like?

The hallmark of degenerative spondylolisthesis is a combination of back pain and leg symptoms that get worse with standing and walking, and better when you sit down or bend forward (which opens the spinal canal and briefly takes pressure off the nerves).

Common symptoms

Red-flag symptoms that should get you to a spine specialist urgently include new weakness, foot drop, loss of bladder or bowel control, or numbness in the area that would touch a saddle.

How Is It Diagnosed?

Diagnosis starts with a careful conversation and physical exam. Your surgeon will want to know how far you can walk before the symptoms start, what makes them better, and whether you have any weakness. Then we move to imaging.

Standing X-rays

Here's something important: an MRI lying flat can miss or under-estimate the slip. The slip often only shows up when you're standing up, because gravity is what pulls the vertebra forward. That's why we routinely order standing flexion-extension X-rays — you bend forward and backward, and we measure how much the slip moves. A slip that changes more than 3 mm between positions is considered unstable, and that affects treatment decisions.

MRI

An MRI shows the soft tissues — the discs, the ligaments, and most importantly the spinal canal and nerve roots. It tells us where the stenosis is, which nerves are being pinched, and how severe the compression is.

CT scan

A CT scan shows bone detail better than an MRI. It's especially useful for surgical planning when fusion and screw placement are being considered.

Types of Spondylolisthesis

Spondylolisthesis is sorted in two ways: by cause and by severity.

By cause

By severity: the Meyerding grade

The Meyerding classification, developed in 1932 and still used today, describes how far the vertebra has slipped as a percentage of the width of the vertebra below it:

Most degenerative cases are Grade I or II. High-grade slips (III-V) are almost always isthmic or congenital and often need more complex reconstructive surgery.

How Is It Treated?

Start with the conservative stuff

Most people with degenerative spondylolisthesis never need surgery. The first line of treatment is physical therapy focused on core stabilization, hip flexibility, and posture. Weight loss helps when it's relevant. NSAIDs and short courses of other pain medications can take the edge off a flare. For leg pain that isn't settling, epidural steroid injections can provide weeks to months of relief and help you get through physical therapy.

If you've tried a reasonable course of non-operative care for at least 8-12 weeks and you're still limited — you can't walk the distances you want, your leg pain is keeping you from sleeping, or you're developing weakness — that's when surgery enters the conversation.

Decompression alone

The simplest operation is a laminectomy — removing the small piece of bone at the back of the spine that's pressing on the nerves. The nerves are unroofed, the stenosis is relieved, and you leave the slip alone. The advantages are a shorter operation, less blood loss, a faster recovery, and no hardware. The disadvantage is the risk that, over time, the slip progresses and you need another operation.

Decompression with fusion

The alternative is to decompress the nerves and stabilize the unstable segment with a fusion — placing screws and rods between the two vertebrae so they heal together into one solid piece, usually with a small cage placed into the disc space for support. The fusion stops the slip from getting worse and addresses the instability directly. The trade-off is a longer operation, more blood loss, a longer recovery, and the risks that come with hardware.

The big debate: to fuse or not to fuse?

Two landmark randomized trials published back-to-back in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2016 came to different conclusions on this question. The American SLIP trial (Ghogawala et al.) found that adding fusion to laminectomy produced better quality-of-life scores and substantially fewer reoperations at 4 years. The Swedish trial (Försth et al.) found no difference between fusion and decompression alone at 2 and 5 years. A Scandinavian trial published in 2021 (NORDSTEN-DS, Austevoll et al.) similarly found decompression alone non-inferior at 2 years, though with a somewhat higher reoperation rate.

The honest answer is that the right operation depends on the individual: how much instability is on the standing films, whether the patient has mostly leg pain or mostly back pain, their bone quality, their age, and their goals. An experienced spine surgeon will walk you through all of this and pick the operation that fits you.

Minimally invasive and robotic approaches

When fusion is the right choice, there are several ways to do it. A minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) places the interbody cage and pedicle screws through small tubular retractors, splitting the back muscles rather than cutting them. Published 5-year outcomes from the Quality Outcomes Database registry show MIS-TLIF and open TLIF deliver equivalent long-term results for Grade I spondylolisthesis, with less blood loss and shorter hospital stays on the MIS side.

Robotic navigation is the next layer. A robotic arm, guided by a pre-operative plan built on your CT scan, helps the surgeon place the pedicle screws with millimeter accuracy. This is especially useful in minimally invasive cases, where the surgeon can't see as much of the anatomy directly. UChicago offers robotic and augmented-reality guided spine fusion in dedicated operating rooms.

Second Opinion

Considering surgery or planning a second opinion?

Our multidisciplinary team reviews complex cases together. You'll get a coordinated plan, not one opinion.

Call (773) 702-2123

What Are the Outcomes?

Outcomes for degenerative spondylolisthesis surgery are, broadly speaking, very good. Most patients who meet surgical criteria experience meaningful improvement in leg pain, walking distance, and overall function.

The long-term SPORT data — an 8-year follow-up of one of the largest spondylolisthesis trials ever done — showed that surgically treated patients maintained substantial improvements in pain, function, and disability compared with non-operatively treated patients. The SLIP trial's 4-year results showed that adding fusion to laminectomy produced durable improvement in physical quality of life and, importantly, cut the reoperation rate roughly in half (14% with fusion vs. 34% decompression-alone at 4 years).

TrialComparisonFollow-upKey result
SPORT (2007, 8-yr f/u 2018)Surgery vs. non-operative8 yearsSurgery remained significantly better for pain and function
SLIP (Ghogawala 2016)Laminectomy + fusion vs. laminectomy alone4 yearsFusion: better SF-36, reoperation 14% vs. 34%
Försth / Swedish (2016)Decompression + fusion vs. decompression alone2 and 5 yearsNo clinical difference; higher cost with fusion
NORDSTEN-DS (Austevoll 2021)Decompression alone vs. with fusion2 yearsDecompression alone non-inferior; reoperation slightly higher

The upshot is that both operations work — and the best results come from a surgeon who chooses the right one for the right patient, performs it well, and manages the recovery carefully. That's where experience actually changes outcomes.

References

Ghogawala Z, Dziura J, Butler WE, et al. Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;374(15):1424-1434. PMID: 27074067
Försth P, Ólafsson G, Carlsson T, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;374(15):1413-1423. PMID: 27074066
Austevoll IM, Hermansen E, Fagerland MW, et al. Decompression with or without fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021;385(6):526-538. PMID: 34347953
Austevoll IM, Hermansen E, Fagerland MW, et al. Decompression alone or with fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (NORDSTEN-DS): five year follow-up of a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2024;386:e079771. PMID: 39111800
Abdu WA, Sacks OA, Tosteson ANA, et al. Long-term results of surgery compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine. 2018;43(23):1619-1630. PMID: 29652786
Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2007;356(22):2257-2270. PMID: 17538085
Matz PG, Meagher RJ, Lamer T, et al. Guideline summary review: An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. The Spine Journal. 2016;16(3):439-448. PMID: 26681351
Koslosky E, Gendelberg D. Classification in brief: The Meyerding classification system of spondylolisthesis. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2020;478(5):1125-1130. PMID: 32282463
Chan AK, Bisson EF, Bydon M, et al. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry. Neurosurgical Focus. 2023;54(1):E2. PMID: 36587409
Chan AK, Bisson EF, Bydon M, et al. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database. Neurosurgical Focus. 2017;43(2):E11. PMID: 28760035
Molina CA, Sciubba DM, Greenberg JK, Khan M, Witham T. Clinical accuracy and initial experience with augmented reality-assisted pedicle screw placement: the first 205 screws. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2021;36(3):351-357. PMID: 34624854
Perdomo-Pantoja A, Ishida W, Zygourakis C, et al. Accuracy of current techniques for placement of pedicle screws in the spine: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of 51,161 screws. World Neurosurgery. 2019;126:664-678.e3. PMID: 30880208

Have Questions About Spondylolisthesis?

Our team is here to review your case, discuss your options, and help you take the next step.

Schedule: (773) 702-2123